Repeatedly I have heard it expressed that what will put a stop to the rapacity of Holocaustomania is that the Jewish leaders know no limits when they perceive an area - a soft underbelly in society - to be exploited without shame. The leverage for this unleashed exploitation, enforced by an incessantly whining media campaign bestowing special victim status on Jews, is to be found in the laws of many lands - laws which were written and refined by Jewish lawyers and politicials and are enforced by judges of the tribe.
According to research provided by the Leo Baeck Institute, prior to 1848 no Jew could become a lawyer in Germany unless he was baptized; thereafter, although it was permitted, a Jew had to swear a Christian oath. By 1871 there were 75 Jewish lawyers, and 124 judges in Germany.
By the end of the 19th century, non-baptized Jews constituted over one quarter of the Prussian legal system.
During the Weimar republic, there were two Jewish Ministers of Justice, and legal equality was given to all by the Constitution, regardless of religious affiliation, and as a result, by 1932 there were 796 Jewish judges.
In 1933, there were about 1800 lawyers in Berlin alone, out of a total of 3,500, who were Jews - in a country where the Jewish population was less than 1% of the nation.
During the Third Reich, Hitler quickly established a dual system - Jewish lawyers, Jewish courts, and Jewish judges for Jews, and German courts for Germans.
Today, Berlin has a population of 3 million. About 7,000 of them are lawyers, with perhaps 50 of them Jewish.
(Undoubtedly a fudged statistic, but who's counting...? Or was it a typo and meant to be 50%?")
(The above statistics are found in The Jewish Press, July 9, 1999 issue)
What does that mean for what the Germans call the "Raubzug" - a Robber's Crusade? (The statistics about Germany are on the Zundelsite. Check under "Reparations")
According to a July 2, 1999 article in the Jewish Press, titled "Dutch Obligation", a new book by a war historian ". . . documents the processes by which Dutch banks made billions of dollars trading property stolen from the country's Jews during World War II."
This book, titled "Robbery: The Theft of Jewish Belongings During World War II", by Gerard Alders, ". . . shows that some $500 million of assets - now worth $7 billion - came into the hands of financial institutions; Alders says that the post-war Dutch government covered up aspects of the theft."
Another article in the same issue of the Jewish Press, written by Schmuel Ben Eliezer, tells us that
". . . (i)t was announced that an advertising campaign with full page ads in 40 countires in 29 languages and 500 newspapers will be utilized to publicize (the Swiss Bank settlement) to Holocaust surivors and their heirs, wherever they may be. (...)"
According to this article, Rabbi Goldschmidt, the chief rabbi in Moscow, said that
"Russian Jews deserve a fair share in the settlement because the Jews in Russia have suffered twice, once during the Shoah and afterwards in Communist Russia."
In Budapest, Stepen Whiston, a lawyer connected with the class action suit,
". . . estimated that there are about 860,000 Holocaust survivors worldwide."
That's 55 years after the end of World War II! Imagine how many survivors there must have been in 1945. Actuarial tables to the rescue - so we can extrapolate backwards!
Perhaps the most telling quote comes from the Jewish Press Magazine of July 30, 1999:
"Through a badly needed financial boost to concentration camp memorials, the Government (of Germany) is committing Germans of the next century to carry on the process of remembrance.
"Michael Naumann, cultural advisor to Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, said last Friday that funding to memorials "at authentic locations" will increase from $16 million in 2000 to $27 million in 2003."
And so the beat goes on. The other day, I was talking to a very nice Midwest radio talk show host, explaining what I meant when I said that political correctness was costly. I'll call him Jim.
Jim said to me, after I quickly summarized the tenets of Revisionism: "Then why did I see all these photographs, all this blood and gore, about Auschwitz in Sixth Grade?"
I said to him: "So that you will now blindly support the State of Israel. You'll never ask a question. You will just pay and pay."
Jim, in that sharp, aggressive tone I've come to know so well: "I will ask you a question. What do you think of Adolf Hitler?'
I said: "What do ***you*** think of him? Ask yourself why you are asking that question. It's useful, isn't it? It has the stopping power of a bullet."
Jim after a long pause: "Well, yes. And why was I the one who used it?"
"Perhaps you learned about Hitler in Sixth Grade?"
"I also learned about Nuremberg. I've been told that that was a legitimate war criminals' trial."
"I've been told that it was merely a Kangaroo court, according to the US Supreme Court's Chief Justice."
We left it there. I'll do the show in early October. I think I have made inroads.
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes Jewish."
(Rabbi Martin Siegel in New York Magazine, p. 32, Jan 18, 1972)
Back to Table of Contents of the Sept. 1999 ZGrams