I read an absolutely extraordinary couple of opening paragraph by one Helen Connell, <hconnell@lfpress.com> of the London Free Press, dated today.
Here they are - and you make of them what you will.
"When I heard five people had been shot at a Jewish centre in Los Angeles, one of them a five-year-old boy, my first reaction was, "Please, let the shooter be Jewish." Not because that would make the shooting less tragic, but because it would allow the rest of us to feel just a little safer. If it had been a Jewish person, I could have written the incident off as being the work of some kind of psychotic killer -- impossible to rid ourselves of, but easier to label and safely put out of our minds.
"But Buford O'Neil Furrow is not a Jewish name and, from what we know so far, while he may be insane he was also motivated by hate."
So there you have the double standard:
Psychotic killer (Jewish) + murder = psychotic killer, ". . . easier to label and safely put out of our minds."
Psychotic killer (non-Jewish) + murder = psychotic killer, ". . . may be insane" but ***also*** ". . . motivated by hate."
So this Baruch Goldstein fellow was not motivated by hate against innocent Palestinians when he gunned them down at prayer? That's why he had a quasi shrine built to him where orthodox Jews take their young children? Where ritual pilgrimages are made by entire families, public prayers conducted by rabbis at his gravesite - where no sign of remorse or compassion for the victims are visible?
It is this kind of hubris predicated on a double standard that makes it so exceedingly difficult to buy into this liberal firlefanz that all are equal under the sun. Especially those in the media know that they cannot be objective about anything pertaining to Jews without running afoul of their wrath - and the charge that they're "hateful" and "anti-semitic", one-half inch away from being a "Nazi".
The two letters below bear repeating. Both were reproduced in the December 4, 1992 [p. 19] issue of The Australian Jews News:
In "I Surrender", Terry Lane, broadcaster with ABC television (the Australian Broadcasting Corporation) and newspaper columnist, wrote:
I have said publicly that I will never write or speak on the subject of Israel or Palestine ever again. Here is why:
The Zionist lobby in this country is malicious, implacable, mendacious and dangerous. They have caused me a great deal of lost sleep - and in the end my insomnia has not contributed anything to the resolution of the conflict over Palestine. I might as well keep my mouth shut and get some sleep.
What's more, once the expression "anti-Semite'" hits the air, or, heaven forfend, the sacred formula "six million" is uttered, then I know from bitter experience that there is not one manager or editor in the country who will defend an underling. We are thrown to the jackals.
In the end the truly tolerant have no defence against intolerance. I surrender. To the Zionists I say: you win. To the Palestinians: forgive my cowardice.
....................
In "Own Worst Enemies" , Phillip Adams, columnist for The Australian, a Sydney-based nationally circulated daily paper and broadcaster with ABC television, told his readers:
I have fronted at numerous Jewish fundraising dinners, written obsessively about the Holocaust, trudged around the death camps, performed opening ceremonies at exhibitions in the Great Synagogue in Sydney and fulminated against John Bennett and other revisionists.
As a consequence, I've enjoyed excellent relations with the Jewish community and with its principal political and social organizations.
And then a funny thing happened. I was the guest speaker at a fundraising dinner of Jewish doctors in Sydney. It was a pleasant, congenial occasion, and despite my friendly criticism of certain aspects of Jewish political behavior (in Australia), I was warmly applauded.
However, the Jewish News gave a slightly distorted version of what I'd said, and, lo and behold, I suddenly became the Jews' worst enemy. Dozens of letters accused me of being an anti-semite.
I then received an extraordinary letter from [Jewish community leader] Bill Rubinstein which I found offensive in tone and remarkably patronizing. As it illustrated some of the very points I'd made in my talk to the doctors, I published it in The Australian and all hell broke loose. Lots more letters accusing me of being an anti-semite.
All in all, it was such a bruising and unpleasant experience that I decided not to write on Jewish matters again. Or at least to take a long sabbatical from matters semitic.
I could cover pages with evidence of my good-will to the Jewish community.... In short, I felt that I'd paid my dues. And yet it took only a hint of cautious, friendly criticism to put me on the receiving end of Jewish anger.
. . . When it comes to dealing with the outside world, with (us) goyim who are also concerned by aspects of Israeli policy, the [Jewish] ranks close and the reactions can be excessive.
I could tell you of many attempts to repress or suppress an energetic debate on matters relating to Israel. I could describe a number of circumstances where Jewish organizations used a sledge-hammer to crack a walnut, over-reacting in a ludicrous manner to things they'd found objectionable in print or broadcasting.
When talking to the wider world, I try and explain such excesses in terms of Jewish suffering and anxieties. But when I talk to Jews, I have to say that, again and again, you're your own worst enemies. Instead of trying to persuade people to your point of view, there's a tendency to bully, to threaten, to censor.
So as a friend who has laid wreaths at the concentration camps. ... let me ask Australian Jews, and Jewish organizations, to be more careful in the way they respond to debate in the Australian media. In America there has been a systematic overkill which has led to widespread resentment. I would not like that to happen here. <end>
Thought for the Day:
"If you travel throughout Europe, you'll find police outside every synagogue. I hope this won't come to the US."
(Abe Foxman, as quoted August 11 in an Associated Press article)