Ever since the largest, best-financed and widely-feared Jewish smear organization, the Anti-Defamation League - with a reported budget of $30 million, professional staff and offices in most large US cities - labeled me as an "Extremist" in one of their publications, I have been thinking of how to best hold them accountable for their irresponsible vilification and demonization of people who don't agree with their prescribed point of view, and who refuse to kowtow to the Holocaust Enforcers at the expense of their own people's history and culture.
Ironically, this 1996 report on me as an "Extremist" lists my achievements, which are reputable and verifiable, to which their staffers simply helped themselves by downloading the information posted on my literary website. They took this information and gave it their own spin.
There was nothing but nothing "extreme" in my bio or supplementary documents. They were various biographical summaries listing my activities and honors earned as an educator, writer and convention speaker of some note over more than 20 years.
In the past, these summaries have gotten me prestigious lecture bookings and work as a freelance writer - respected coast to coast. Nobody ***ever*** characterized those documents reflecting my professional achievements and/or my private lifestyle as "extreme"!
In waltz the intellectual Holocaust Enforcer terrorists in pin-striped suits - laptops and all - and proceed with impunity to character-assassinate me! They never called me for an interview. They never probed my point of view. They simply did what they have been doing to hundreds of people whom they consider inimical to Jewish interests: They destroy their reputations to prevent them from remaining effective in public.
The ***only*** thing they claim about me to back up their smear label "Extremist" is that I am associated with Ernst Zundel and that I run the Zundelsite. That makes me an "extremist" negating a lifetime of reputable work?
It is a false and baseless claim. What's wrong with volunteering to assist a "politically incorrect" friend whom I consider worthy of my talent and expertise? Where is it written I can't do that? I am a sovereign American allowed to speak my mind, protected by the US Constitution.
Schmierfinks!
Just what is the ADL's definition of an "Extremist"?
To smear me with that label is serious business - as they must surely know. It is a devastating claim that can get me on police watch lists, FBI dossiers and border watches. It can get me barred from different countries, and can be the basis for all kinds of government busybody harassment activities. How dare these Holocaust Enforcers marginalize and vilify good, decent people with impunity - without expecting that their frequently innocent victims will want one day to fight back?
Victims of this Jewish practice of silencing legal and entirely justified political opposition are now fighting back - at least in Canada, as I have reported before, where attorney Doug Christie has won two important victories in a row in civil courts for damages in libel and slander cases.
* Doug won for Malcolm Ross, a teacher who was fired for being politically incorrect in his writings outside the classroom, and who was subsequently brutally ridiculed by a Jewish cartoonist in a horrendous cartoon, as well as smeared in the media.
* Doug won for Eileen Pressler and her husband, who were characterized in a nationwide TV broadcast news feature as having built a "military compound" with bunkers etc. on their property - when all they built was a retirement home.
And chances are good that Doug Christie will win for C-FAR, Canadians for Foreign Aid Reform, headed by yet another victim of a Jewish character assassination smear, its nationally known director Paul Fromm.
Fromm had been a long-term "politically incorrect" target of the Chosenites for his views on unchecked Third-World immigration into Canada, and for associating with people in Canada and the USA the Canadian Zionist interests did not approve of. So?
Fromm has decided to fight back. Here's how:
C-FAR Sues Michael Elterman and Canadian Jewish Congress for Defamation
A lawsuit filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, July 31 charges the Canadian Jewish Congress and Michael Elterman, president of the Canadian Jewish Congress Pacific Region, with defamation for the publication and circulation of a document entitled Canadian Jewish Congress, Pacific Region: Issues of Concern to the Jewish Community of British Columbia, 1995-1998.
The document circulated to educators, policy makers, and politicians, alleges that ***C-FAR has been involved in acts of violence against blacks, visible minorities and homosexuals and is further guilty of spreading hate -- a Criminal Code offence, under Section 319 -- against these groups.*** (Emphasis added)
"These smears are outrageously false and calculated to demonize us and drive us outside the bonds of respectability." says C-FAR Director Paul Fromm. "While we have only modest resources and are reluctant to get ourselves bogged down before the courts, this is a matter of honour. We have always sought peaceful change and dialogue."
"It is we who have been the victims of violence from ARA terrorists and it is we who have had our meetings cancelled by threats of violence. For the CJC, Pacific Region to classify us as violent criminals is a slur and we're not prepared to take it any more."
C-FAR, Citizens for Foreign Aid Reform Inc., is a non-profit educational organization incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. C-FAR's lawyer is the noted Victoria civil liberties champion Douglas H. Christie.
The text of the statement of claim follows:
In the Supreme Court of British Columbia
BETWEEN: Citizens for Foreign Aid Reform Inc. [Plaintiff]
AND Canadian Jewish Congress and Michael Elterman [Defendants]
1. The Plaintiff is a body corporate, duly incorporated pursuant to Letters Patent in the Province of Ontario under the number 416681 on or about June 20, 1979.
2. The defendant Canadian Jewish Congress is a body corporate under the laws of Canada.
3. The plaintiff employs persons to carry out its objects, and for funds relies on support of donors relying on its good reputation in pursuit of its objects.
4. The Defendant, Canadian Jewish Congress, acts as public advocate of alleged tolerance and harmonious relations for Jews and others. The defendant, Elterman, is the authorized spokesperson of the Canadian Jewish Congress, Pacific Region. The Canadian Jewish Congress, Pacific Region is an authorized agent and recognized entity of the Canadian Jewish Congress authorized to speak in its name.
5. The defendants, and each of them, in the first half of the year 1998 caused a brochure to issue over its name, and with its imprimatur entitled "CANADIAN JEWISH CONGRESS, PACIFIC REGION: Issues of Concern to the Jewish Community of British Columbia, 1995-1998."
6. As a sub topic in the publication referred to above, a chapter was published under the title HATE GROUPS AND HATE PROPAGANDA. This chapter contained the following paragraph regarding the plaintiff:
"While strongly tied to American hate groups, the White Supremacist movement in Canada has an identity distinct from its southern neighbors. Homosexuals, Jews, South Asians, African Canadians and other groups have been the targets of violence and hate propaganda by groups like the Western Guard, the Northern Hammerskins, the Heritage Front, the Canadian League of Rights, Citizens for Foreign Aid Reform (C-FAR), the National Party of Canada (NPOC), the Church of the Creator, and the Council on Public Affairs, etc. Canadian hate groups often promote themselves as legitimate academic movements, usually under the guise of free speech, grassroots advocacy on public issues or Holocaust revisionism."
7. The foregoing publication was widely distributed to Judges, lawyers, police officials, and important decision-makers, as well as the public, in a distribution known to the defendant, but details of which are presently unknown to the plaintiff. This publication was done in British Columbia where the "Pacific Region" has its headquarters, and primarily circulated the brochure in British Columbia. The foregoing paragraph was extremely defamatory of the plaintiff because it falsely implies:
(a) that the plaintiff is tied to American hate groups;
(b) that homosexuals, Jews, South Asians, and African Canadians have been the targets of violence and hate propaganda from the plaintiff;
(c) that the plaintiff is deceitful and operates under the guise of free speech in a subterfuge;
(d) that the plaintiff is involved in the promotion of hatred and anti-Semitism; and
(e) that the plaintiff should be classified as a "Canadian hate group".
8. The foregoing meanings are either derived from innuendo within the knowledge of persons of reasonable intelligence in society (particulars of which can be provided on demand if necessary) or are, by their ordinary and plain meaning, false and defamatory in the extreme.
9. The foregoing defamatory statements are malicious and part of an ongoing campaign of vilification and incitement of hatred in which the Canadian Jewish Congress is engaged in competition with other Jewish groups to raise funds to combat alleged anti-Semitism and to create fear and apprehension about free speech or political views they do not like.
10. The foregoing comments are woven together by the Canadian Jewish Congress and Michael Elterman in their conspiratorial world view to create power for themselves in combating a mythical enemy.
WHEREFORE THE PLAINTIFF CLAIMS:
A. General Damages
B. Punitive Damages
C. Compensatory Damages
D. Prejudgment interest according to law; and E. Costs of this action."
Further information can be found at http://www.populist.org http://www.canadafirst.net/c-far
Fromm's opposition will, of course, screech "Anti-Semitism!" - but they caused this one! Nobody else!
Now we will see what happens next. It is very clear to people in the know WHY this document that smeared C-FAR and Paul Fromm was made widely available to Canada's ruling oligarchy - such as politicians, judges, high ranking police officials etc. It was not a document meant for the public eye - it was meant to criminalize him behind his back, because those to whom it was sent without Paul's knowledge would have had the power to destroy him.
Somebody leaked it to Paul Framm. Kudos to Paul - that he decided to fight back! More of us should - and will!
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
(Thomas Paine)