I have just returned from a trip up north where I took care of some private matters, and was very happy to see the public momentum in Canada against the parasitic, predatory hate industry parading under "human rights" take yet another hit from mainstream media - where some of the keener folks are finally (!) beginning to wake up to what is really going on.
And high time, too. The turning point in the Canadian media came with the Zundel press conference after Ernst was banned from the Parliament press room where he intended to announce the Soviet style ruling that "...truth is no defense." Boy, has that ever come to haunt the Kommissars!
In yesterday's Globe and Mail editorial, we read the following under the title "Lack of discrimination among human rights: If human-rights commissions are out of control, we are largely to blame."
Globe and Mail: News item: Human-rights tribunal awards $5-billion to a group of federal civil servants, mostly women, charging the government discriminated against them by paying them less than other civil servants doing completely different jobs.
News item: Human-rights tribunal calls cranky Vancouver newspaper columnist Doug Collins before it to answer charges of "discriminatory publication."
News item: Human-rights tribunal convened to hear charges against three Toronto corner stores, accused of discriminating against women by selling magazines such as Playboy."
Zundelsite Comment: Forgotten in this line-up is that the Zundel-Trial is now approaching two years' worth of court time, tribunal costs and legal expenses incurred in defending freedom on the net. Forgotten as well are once again the vilification of Ernst Zundel and how the so-called Human Rights Commission Kommissars are trampling all over his rights with hard-heeled Soviet boots.
Globe and Mail: Are the country's federal and provincial human-rights bodies out of control, or at least way out of touch? Yes, sometimes. But the story is a bit more complicated than that. The human-rights poohbahs are not so much poking their noses into places where they are not wanted as trying as best they can to carry out vague, expansive jobs that legislatures mistakenly assigned to them.
Zundelsite Comment: Poobahs? Piranhas would be a better word. And mainstream media have yet to learn that legislators have NOT mistakenly assigned them "vague, expansive jobs" - these legislators, to use a Lyndon Johnson homily, have put their peckers right in the pockets of the Holoschlockers.
Globe and Mail: Consider the recent multibillion-dollar pay-equity ruling. The whole thing may be nonsense, but it's too easy to blame the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal entirely for that. The methodology by which the "true worth" of jobs is determined is, of course, pure necromancy: There is no way of determining how much people really "deserve" to be paid, unless you want to establish a system where moral philosophers, rather than the market, decide how much various jobs are really "worth." But federal law orders the tribunal to administer just such a regime. The Canadian Human Rights Commission must investigate and if necessary bring before the tribunal allegations that the salaries of people in federally regulated industries do not reflect their true "value."
Zundelsite Comment: Ever heard of Soviet-style dictatorships? "Moral philosophers" abounded who wrote the rules - and never mind the people.
Globe and Mail: In other words, the commission and the tribunal are largely carrying out Parliament's wishes. There is a long tradition in Canada of governments spending the next generation's money, and pay equity is merely a variation on the theme.
Zundelsite Comment: That's right! The Trudeau socialists and intellectual Marxist hippies legislated the neo-Marxist agenda, while a Communist-infiltrated, Zionist-manipulated media acted as their shills - and shields!
Globe and Mail. Passed in the late 1970s, it's a case of a government buying public relations points on credit. The upside is all at the front-end; the downsides are unseen, unknown and somewhere in the future.
Zundelsite Comment: There were plenty of warnings in the 1970s, and the outcome was NOT "unseen, unknown." The writing was right on the wall, and Doug Collins, who was recently caught in the sharp teeth of the piranhas, was one of the few who rang the alarm bell early. Did it do Collins any good? The mainstream media ran noisy interference for the parliamentary wrecking crew loose in Ottawa at the time, and his words were spoken to the wind.
Globe and Mail: Civil libertarians were shocked when, in 1997, a British Columbia human-rights tribunal was convened to hear charges against Mr. Collins, an occasional columnist in Vancouver's North Shore News. Mr. Collins had not violated the Criminal Code's hate law -- so surely this was one more case of prosecutorial overzealousness on the part of a human-rights commmission?
Zundelsite Comment: No, not at all. Mr. Collins did the Unspeakable: He made fun of the Holocaust Dogma. Those who had inspired and crafted the so-called Human Rights legislation created it for just such cases as Collins, Zundel and others.
Globe and Mail: There have been more than a few such examples, attempts to expand the law on the backs of hapless, shallow-pocketed defendants that would be unacceptable if done by a Crown prosecutor.
Zundelsite Comment: Hear, hear! What is happening in the Zundelsite case would never - repeat, NEVER! - be permitted in any court of law! Even the pernicious "hate laws" allow truth to be a defense! Not with these Kommissars! The Globe and Mail, of course, was afraid to even once mention the most prominent case in Canada now before the Human Rights Tribunal. We should quote them the Bible: "For they spake not for fear of the Jews."
Globe and Mail: The Ontario Human Rights Commission's lengthy pursuit of three corner stores for carrying legal erotic magazines -- the commission claimed the periodicals were discrimination against women -- is just one instance.
Zundelsite Comment: That old hag - pornography - is always trotted out when the Holocaust censors need to legitimize their shady enterprise. Let no one be deceived!
Globe and Mail: But the pursuit of Mr. Collins was something else. In 1993, the B.C. government introduced legislation ordering the human-rights commission to deal with the scourge of "discriminatory publication." The law makes it an offence to display or publish anything, "that indicates discrimination or an intention to discriminate," or "is likely to expose a person or a group or class of persons to hatred or contempt because of the race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, religion, martial status, family status, physical or mental disability, sex, sexual orientation or age of that person or that group or class of persons."
Zundelsite Comment: And the Globe and Mail tells its readers in the same breath that it might have been "prosecutorial overzealousness"? Go to the CHRC website. Read what these neo-Marxists gave them the power to do! Everything and anything is forbidden - including speaking the truth in one's defense!
Globe and Mail: In the case against Mr. Collins, the tribunal gave this dangerously broad legislation a narrow reading, and sensibly acquitted him. But the law still stands -- and Mr. Collins's column is once again before the tribunal.
Zundelsite Comment: The gentleman walked out. And I predict that others will walk out. And high time, too! This is my private opinion, and Mr. Zundel will probably not agree in public - but I say that were these Kangaroo Kourt Kommissars not such a useful spectacle of "human rights" gone absolutely berserk, he might have walked as well - and who would cast the first stone? But see? Here is one patriot who fights that "Human Rights" monstrosity in full view of the press!
Globe and Mail: Back in Ottawa, the Liberals fret over an appeal against the pay-equity ruling. We have another solution: avoid such cases in future by rewriting the law. Parliament has the power to undo what it once did -- if only the government has the courage to spend its political capital rather than our money.
Zundelsite Comment: One step toward achieving that solution would be to cover the Zundelsite controversy fairly and to expose the Human Rights industry and its dangerous usurping of freedom. I have yet to be interviewed by a Globe and Mail reporter to give my side of the story. I might have some relevant things to say that might make Globe and Mail readers decide that at least one major paper's news reporters have their peckers after all where they belong - and not in someone else's pockets.
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"If establishment scholars, particularly those who are Jews, can question previously accepted truths [about the Holocaust], why is it wrong when Bradley Smith does the same?"
(-from Deborah Lipstadt, in *Denying the Holocaust*, on p. 189)