I reported yesterday, based on a couple of letters I received from Paul Fromm, editor of the Canadian Free Speech Monitor, the story of the alleged Hanger application to put in a private member's bill in the House to criminalize possession of so-called "hate literature" - and the story is apparently just rumor.
Canadian columnist, Doug Collins, who checked it out, wrote this:
"It got into some newspaper that way but Hanger denies it. His comment was, "Who will censor the censors?" He also said he might consider such a bill IF the newspaper reporter could define hate, which he couldn't . . . . A media set-up that was widely reported."
I don't know who floated this story, and why - but at any rate, until further notice, this ZGram is a retraction, with my apologies. We are all in a high state of alert when it comes to curtailing what little is left of free speech - especially in Canada. Things are happening in the Great White North that aren't very nice at all and will affect a lot of ethnic folks, not just your handy "Nazis". Much more about that later.
I'll give you a related example (left intact except for paragraph breaks) that came from Denmark where Peter Herngaard of fight-censorship wrote:
(All (mis)spellings left intact)
"Today former city council candidate for the Danish People's Party Henning Rye Pedersen was convicted in the District Court of Silkeborg for breach of S.266(b).
Why? For expressing his opinion about immigration in racial stereotypes. Mr. Pedersen was fined 200 * 20 DKK (4000 DKK). The case is pending appeal.
In contrary to what Ingrid Rimland seems to believe this is not a Jewish conspiracy. It's not Rabbi Cooper. It's not The Trilateral Commission or The Council on Foreign Relations.
It's our elected officials and the U. N. Once human rights was a honest and progressive agenda, and indead still it's.
However, affirmative action, special rights and speech codes have overshadowed the once progressive endeavour of creating *rights for all*.
Instead rights have become to mean something very different, group rights for minorities rather than eagalitarian rights for all. The implication of the hate laws is not the protection of public order.
Public order is already protected by other statuses. Hate laws serve special interest groups who are so vulnerable they can't tolerate excessive criticism.
Another troubling aspect of the hate laws is their discriminatory nature. These laws do not further equality but instead aid the creation of new race, culture and gender based classes of citizens with distinctly different rights."
Peter - of whom I am quite fond, which is not mutual - has in the past given me a hard time saying that I took credit where no credit was due with my claiming that there was more kinship out there in the world with us than people were ready to admit. He wants me to state he feels no kinship with our cause and wants me to put in this disclaimer:
"I can't prevent you from quoting me on your mailing list since that would be a little hypocritical given my opposition to censorship. Go ahead. But please provide a disclaimer stating that I am not a member nor a supporter of your cause but only defend your rights to speak."
To which I say: Amen!
I would say that by no stretch of the imagination are all of my readers "supporters" of our "cause", either financially or in their willingness to put their names where there convictions are. And not a few of them are enemies - even intelligence agents of various foreign and maybe even private and government agencies with a yen for censorship or with something to fear from truth in history. We are not living in a world made of heroes.
Many of my ZGram readers are, unfortunately, still on the fence, so to speak - eager to learn more, but unwilling to face the repercussions which come with telling the truth today. Censorship is brutal these days in places like Canada and Germany.
I can say this: It will undoubtedly get worse before it will get any better. And I do believe that most censorship comes from one source either directly or is usually inspired by that source - which is the Chosenites and their repressive agenda - the rest is just a smoke screen.
One reader summarized it well:
"As in every battle, the last few feet are the toughest, and that is where (our enemies) are currently, trying to entice those doing the dirty work that they must continue, in whatever interest they believe will work, and using whatever excuse they believe will succeed.
"There is a problem, however, and that is that every step from here on awakens people on an exponential scale, with its correspondent increase in opposition.
"The tighter the noose, the quicker people will realize they cannot breathe! And that being the 'bottom line' of their efforts, everything they do in the last stages will expose them like never before.
"And Ingrid, you know how they hate us! But we will not only endure, but prevail! Keep the faith!"
Well, yes - they hate us all right. Take away their favorite reflex four-letter "N" word for Whites, and they have very little to sustain them. And don't they know it, too!
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"In the final analysis, Jewish Hollywood can make all the movies they
care to about us, in the hope of destroying Revisionism, but we are the
flame and they are the moth and filming the interplay between the two will not alter the inevitable outcome."
(Michael Hoffman II, commenting on "Denial" - an upcoming movie with Susan Sarandon (sp?) )