November 15, 1997

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

"I've now read the new Bacque book on the German genocide. I don't know if you have obtained a copy in the week since it has been delivered to book stores in Canada; but if not, let me urge you to get one ASAP.

I happened to be in Calgary yesterday, where, at a mall in the Northeast I saw 2 bookstores [W.H. Smith and Coles] had stocked about 8 or 9 hardback copies each. They sell for $30 Canadian.

The book is a bombshell. It is an important book for our side, since it is also an expose of Allied corruption, from World War *One* to 1997, in addition to it being a heartbreaking tale of unspeakable atrocities against European Germans.

Two things:

First, the 7 letters published over 7 days in the Globe and Mail have been the sort that timidly nibble at the margins of a horrendous story. Mine was virtually the only one that made any reference to the millions of German victims. I wrote: "That Germans in their millions should have perished is hardly surprising" [Sept. 24].

There've been some quibbling letters about whether the Dutch rations were the same, less or more than the German calorie-quotas, etc. Sweating small stuff, really.

My suggestion therefore is that you go with the Sept. 20 article--"Did the Allies starve millions of Germans?"

Second, this is a book that the Lobby is *not* going to like - not going to like one damn bit.

As I write, I have every confidence that they are meeting to determine a course of action to silence or discredit Bacque. ( I hope JB followed Irving's advice and kept back some ammunition for the public debate.)

Here are some of the recurring motifs in the book, that weave in and out of the central general storyline--the genocide:

a) the *unabashed* war criminality of the Allied leadership: Henry Morgenthau, Roosevelt, Churchill, Eisenhower, De Gaulle, etc.;

b) the complicity of the media, from the *New York Times* on down, in hiding or denying outrightly what they *knew* to be true relative to Allied atrocities;

c) the *craven* betrayal of the Western Allies of their eastern and central European partners (e.g., the Free Poles, the anti-Hitler Germans, etc.).

d) the efforts of the *vengeful* big cheese in the West to sabotage the decent, humanitarian work of the Hooverites;

e) the *pristine* quality of the KGB documents now available to be searched and examined, revealing Allied complicity in war crimes (e.g. the Tolstoy expose of the British betrayal of White Russians and non-Soviet Cossacks to the so tender mercies of the NKVD in 1945);

f) the *niggardly* attitude of the International Committee of the Red Cross and other Western agencies and governments in making WW 2 documents available for study;

g) the *brazen* destruction and/or disappearance of key telltale documents from many Western archives;

h) endless *unfavourable* comparisons of Allied jailers and henchmen with the Hollywood Nazis;

i) anecdotal tales of unspeakable woe suffered by very young German *children*, grandmothers, women, sick and disabled persons at the hands of Allied henchmen;

j) reminders that the West was *allied with* Joseph Stalin, author of a thousand and one Katyn Forest massacres;

l) reminders that the Allied leadership knew and wilfully *lied* to its people re Katyn and other Soviet and/or Allied atrocities;

m) the favourable spotlight on concerned humanitarian statesmen, whose abject *moral nausea* at the knowledge of what was happening is constantly alluded to throughout the narrative.

James Bacque's book is a steel monkey-wrench thrown straight at the *engine* of the NWO experiment, now 80 years old (i.e., since 1917)."

Thought for the Day:

"It (made) sense only in terms of Soviet design. . . it seems that the elimination of the German population of eastern Europe - at least 15,000,000 people - was planned in accordance with decisions made at Yalta."

(Ralph Franklin Keeling in "Gruesome Harvest")