October 12, 1997

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

How I love it that now it's country-by-country that are waking up to the enormously destructive practices allowed a certain minority forever yammering about their persecution status!

We have already had the Swiss in uproar, the Swedes, the French, to a certain degree even England - and, of course, there is America, just seething about the shadow influence on the Clintonites.

Now Canada is waking up over the passport incident and the Mossad assassination activity. And high time, too - because I heard over and over, when I told friends in Canada how deep the disaffection runs in the US:

"Maybe in the Unites States, but here in Canada, people are much more complacent."

Not any more, it seems!

One ZGram reader wrote:

"There's an extraordinary sense of momentum up here in Canada.

History, shod in a pair of sharp skates, is jumping on our backs at least twice a day. Impossible to lapse back into a dream state.

The passport incident has really rubbed Canadians the wrong way.

Phone-in shows, letters to the editors, messages posted to the newsgroups: all evoke a sense of grassroots indignation.

Meanwhile the Canadian Jewish Congress and B'nai Brith Canada are both lying low during the high holidays."

In the mail came several of those "mini-essays" that Granata Communications sends to me periodically. This one is entitled "Forgive and Forget" and fits into the current mood:

"The 'forgive and forget' attitude of our media as regards recently espoused communist atomic treason physicists forms an interesting contrast to the never-ending witch hunt of purported "Nazi war criminals." The distinctions are worth examining in detail.

First, the actions of Oppenheimer, the Rosenbergs and Mr. Hall were _directly adverse the interests of the United States._ They helped arm a future enemy with the deadliest of weapons. They also helped fortify the domestic tyranny of the world's most brutal dictatorship.

The alleged atrocities of Mr. Demjanjuk et al _never involved the national interests of the United States._ Executions of Jews in World War II, justifiable or not, _never involved the slightest threat to American national interests._

The motives of alleged "Nazi war criminals" also form an interesting comparison with those of Jewish atom treason physicists. Ukrainian collaborationists with Germany justified their behavior because _Nazism was (at least initially) their ally in the liberation of their countries from communism._ If these Ukrainians overlooked the harsher aspects of Naziism, _they emulated the examples of Jewish physicists who overlooked the much greater brutalities of the Jewish killers of the Kremlin._

The American media are not the mouth piece of Dr. Joseph Goebbels. They are the mouthpiece of American Jewry which sees fit to apply the double standard conducive to its interests.

The American public, which is now coming into the true facts of the Jewish atom treason should apply _the standards conducive to American interests._ American Jewry is presently as devoted to the interests of Zionist Israel as it was formerly devoted to the interests of the Jewish controlled U.S.S.R. One need merely mention the name of Jonathan Pollard in this connection.

American interests require the exposure of the Jewish standard in news reporting. An editor or news reporter should not retain his job by submitting to this Jewish double standard but should keep it by telling the American people the truth."

Revisionists believe that "telling the truth" includes the very real presence and ground swell of disaffected people all over the world who are smeared as "racists", "extremists", "neo-Nazis" etc. etc. _for no other reason than to set very harmful legal precedents subsumed under the umbrella of "hate laws"_. In the Ernst Zundel case officially before the Canadian Human Rights Commission on Tuesday, that will be part of the overall aim.

To quote from a brochure of C.A.U.S.E. - an international law firm foundation whose acronyms are taken from the initials of the countries that constitute the so-called "democratic" bloc, namely Canada, Australia-New Zealand, United States of America, South Africa and Europe - we read:

"We have seen that these precedents, once established, are inevitably used to diminish the rights of us all. Where once people had complete freedom of speech, now hate speech is a crime. Segments of history are federally protected against discussion. . . Today, being accused of a . . . hate crime is the worst accusation possible. Rape, child abuse and murder are treated more leniently."

As Ernst and his courageous legal team are getting ready to square off with the Holocaust Promotion Lobby Inquisition that has the chutzpah to call itself a "Human Rights Commission", these thoughts and parallels are crossing people's minds in Canada.

Ingrid

Thought for the Day:

"Why is it a professional liability for lawyer Doug Christie to represent a publisher like Ernst Zundel, but NOT constitute any kind liability for Sol Littman of the Simon Wiesenthal Center's Toronto branch to hire John Rosen, onetime lawyer for the convicted sex fiend, Paul Bernardo (arguably Canada's Charles Manson), to go after Zundel and seek to silence him through the agency of the Canadian Human Rights Commission?"

(A ZGram reader)

Comments? E-Mail: irimland@cts.com

Back to Table of Contents of the Oct. 1997 ZGrams