Copyright (c) 1997 - Ingrid A. Rimland
Jeremy Jones on behalf of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry -v- Dr Fredrick Toben on behalf of Adelaide Institute Enquiry under the Racial Discrimination Act 1975
(Cth) RELIEF SOUGHT BY THE COMPLAINANT
1. A declaration that the Respondent has breached Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975.
2. Order that the Respondent delete material identified as being in breach of the Racial Discrimination Act from the Adelaide Institute website on the Internet, and any other website published by the Respondent, where the offending material is presently accessible to members of the public.
3. Order restraining the Respondent from publishing or re-publishing the offending material or any other material the publication of which would contravene the Racial Discrimination Act.
4. Order that any website on the Internet which is or may hereafter be published by the Respondent permanently bear on its homepage the apology set out in Order 5 together with the following notation:
"Public Notice
Some of the material which has appeared on this website in the past has been found by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission to be in contravention of the Racial Discrimination Act
and, in particular, those sections of the Act which prohibit incitement to racial hatred."
5. Order that the Respondent apologise to the Applicant in the following terms:
"To Mr Jeremy Jones
Executive Vice President
Executive Council of Australian Jewry
146 Darlinghurst Road
Darlinghurst NSW 2010
I hereby unreservedly and unconditionally apologise to you and to the Australian Jewish community for having published material inciting hatred against the Jewish people in contravention of the Racial Discrimination Act. I undertake that neither I nor any employee or agent of mine (actual or ostensible) will publish any such material in the future and that all such material which is presently published by me, or by any employee or agent of mine (actual or ostensible) in any print or electronic media (including the Internet) will forthwith be withdrawn from publication."
6. Order that the Respondent forthwith, and at his own expense, undertake a course of counselling by a conciliation officer of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission as to the rights and responsibilities of the Respondent under the provision of the Racial Discrimination Act."
So, there it is. Not only will the "villain", should he be convicted
(and what else do you expect?) apologize, he will apologize according to
a script. Again, just as was practiced in the Soviet Union - the documents
are sitting, waiting to be signed. And then, just as in Soviet Russia, the
"convict" will be ordered to submit to a brainwash program of
political realignment, and he will pay for it, while the exploiters will
pocket the loot.
Just when you think that you have seen all the chutzpah you will ever need
to see, there's more.
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
Like child abuse, (to be accused of a hate crime) is an accusation that, once made, requires the accused to prove his innocence. The accuser does not have to prove a thing except politically correct outrage."
(A ZGram reader)