Copyright (c) 1997 - Ingrid A. Rimland

October 9, 1997

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:


Some of our "traditional enemies" - to borrow David Irving's favorite description - looking for ways to cause discord, have accused me and others of my persuasion of not being sufficiently involved in and highlighting the encryption controversy affecting the Net, blaming us for not caring sufficiently for "Freedom of Speech" as it affects the technical as opposed to the judicial attempts of censorship.

It's not for lack of trying on my part, believe me! But I am so hopelessly non-technical, I am wise to keep quiet about any of it.

However, I did find a paragraph I am happy to pass on. It came from an article by Russ Mitchell (source not supplied) that explains what you and I may have a hard time understanding:

"Imagine that Congress passed a law requiring people to make copies of their house keys and store them with a government-approved agent. Imagine then that the police or the FBI, armed with a court order, could silently enter your home, unlock your desk drawers and file cabinets, read your private documents, make photocopies, and then leave--all without ever having to tell you they were there.

The cyberspace equivalent of such a law is now being debated in Congress."

Disquieting - isn't it?

* Canada


Ernst just returned from British Columbia, where he went into yet another huddle with his legal team and got another court date milestone under his belt - of which shall be said more a little later.

Let's just say for the time being that it involved CSIS - the nefarious Canadian civilian spy agency that now has egg all over its face for its duplicious ways in the latest Mossad scandal involving Canadian passports with which to send assassins to spray poison into people's ears!

From all I hear, it is a big, big stink in Canada. And here these hypocrites and crooks try to lord it over Ernst as being a "security risk" to Canada! How grotesque can it get! Ernst is restraint personified when he says quietly that "the system demands a correction."

I should also mention that, while on Victoria Island, Ernst gave a first-rate, humorous speech at the George Orwell Dinner - an event that always draws the Unsavory Crowd outside in the dark.

This time, the leftists had not been able to find out the location for the George Orwell dinner from another meeting, which was supposed to be held at a North Vancouver location. Reports Paul Fromm, best-known Canadian anti-immigration activist:

"We outfoxed the terrorists anarchists and Alan Dutton of the Canadian Anti-Racism Education and Research Society. We'd learned 8 days in advance that Dutton planned to protest and disrupt the meeting. We, therefore, changed the venue and didn't tell anyone but trusted subscribers. About 30 anarchists protested outside the original meeting site, according to radio reports. It was a bitterly cold rainy night. I do hope they all got pneumonia."

Gesundheit!

* England


A source from the United Kingdom wrote:

The new book, "Auschwitz 1250 To The Present" or some such has been on sale in London main bookshops for a while. Looked at it at last - Groan: Not another one! - and there it is, in a book published by a US university: the Auschwitz I gas chamber is a fake!!

They even admit that the holes were put in the roof to give a false impression, and that tourists are not told. The deaths all took place at Birkenau now.

Expect you've seen it all anyway, but the real news is: it's on open sale in the biggest book shops in London and elsewhere in the UK.

Last Sunday's Sunday Telegraph carried a piece on a visit to the camp, by one Paul Mansfield, complaining that there was not a serious enough atmosphere among the tourists, with Belgian youths cracking jokes, and Coca Cola on sale. He said he was bored!

A review in another newspaper last week of yet another book began by referring to 'No Business Like Shoah Business'. Can 'Auschwitz fatigue' even be creeping into the ranks of the media?"

You all - hold that perceptive thought!

* A German town named Gollwitz, an agricultural community of about 400 people in the vicinity of Berlin, has recently refused to settle a group of some 60 Jewish emigrants from the former Soviet Union. Jewish leaders in Berlin immediately branded the villagers "anti-Semitic," while Gollwitz residents insisted they ". . . had nothing against Jews but could not take the strain of an extra 60 Jews."

Officials in Brandenburg Province, once a part of communist East Germany, have told Reuters they were surprised by how fiercely Gollwitz residents resisted the proposal of taking in that many Jews. The Reuters article goes on to explain:

"Officially, Germany only permits immigration in rare instances. But, as a sign of its responsibility for the Holocaust that nearly wiped out
Jewish life in Germany and most of Europe, Bonn allows unlimited Jewish immigration."

* Switzerland


As I may have mentioned before, a September 16 Reuters report tells of a group of Swiss outraged by a BBC documentary film highly critical of neutral Switzerland's role during World War Two have filed a criminal complaint charging the work incited hatred of Swiss. The issue is still percolating. I hope that something comes of it.

And speaking of that banking scandal, now we learn to no one's great surprise that Christoph Meili, the banking clerk snitch who did his share fanning the uproar by claiming that he saved important "Nazi gold" documents about to be shredded, and who reportedly fled to the United States in fear of his life, seems to have settled down to glory if not riches. His wife's name is Guiseppina. He has two children, named Miriam and David.

Do we have a clue here why he might have been so eager?

Ingrid

Thought for the Day:

"Here's a question that needs to be asked: Why is it illegal to 'expose a
person or group of persons to hatred or contempt' if their acts are
hateful or contemptable?"

(Sent to the Zundelsite)




Comments? E-Mail: irimland@cts.com


Back to Table of Contents of the Oct. 1997 ZGrams

ÿ