Copyright (c) 1997 - Ingrid A. Rimland
"We acknowledge the receipt of your proposal for our upcoming symposium on Hate on the Internet. We do not believe your proposal would be appropriate for our symposium."
There went our gesture of goodwill to shed light on the darkness!
Since I am not a Canadian, I only know of Canadian politics what comes my
way tangentially, but that has an advantage. It makes for some vivid first-hand
impressions.
There is one very strong impression I took away from my recent trip to Toronto
in May, where I attended the opening session of the Canadian Human Rights
Commission (CHRC) charging Ernst for things I posted on the Zundelsite.
And that impression was, I don't mind telling you, that our opposition was
showing itself up as moldy. They were attracting just the kinds of crawly
things that are attracted to decay.
Here were these pin-striped-and-starched-collar people - supposed to be
all Suffering Indignity, Affronted Decorum and Wronged Propriety - who had
no better judgment than to show up in an Anglo-Saxon courthouse surrounded
by a coterie of noisy, misbehaving, unwashed street gang riffraff with earrings
in their noses?
It did not seem to dawn on them that, even in Ontario, it is no longer chic
in mainstream politics to show yourself surrounded by a Che Guevarra (sp?)
copy cat mob?
Amazing. Just amazing.
I am talking here about a spiritual chasm and restiveness that is becoming
palpable even within traditional anti-Zundel forces between what we are
representing and what our opposition represents.
I'll show you how.
There is in Canada a political movement that is simply called "Reform"
in the vernacular. As far as I can tell, it is the party of the hard-working,
overtaxed, under-represented people.
In voting patterns, Reform comes closest to the Perot movement in the United
States and represents what people thought the country OUGHT to be before
"political correctness" started to destroy it with multi-cults,
"Human Rights" Commissions, "Hate Laws", "Gun Control
Laws" and other tribulations.
Reform, I am told, is strong in central Canada and very strong in Western
Canada - not so, however, in Ontario and pockets of the East where liberals
reign and assure there is plenty of chaos - both in the streets and in the
people's minds.
Reform has unseated the so-called "Conservatives" who were for
over a century one of the two main political parties to run Canada's affairs.
It is now the official opposition party that holds a strong second place
to the Liberals in Parliament.
Reform has been fingered more than once by B'nai Brith and their fellow
travelers as being covert "racist" and as catering to "neo-Nazis".
Because the "wrong" image is costly, Reform leaders have gone
out of their way to distance themselves from that taint.
Not that it made a difference: there were some brazen government attempts
to link Reform to the Right-wing Heritage Front via sting operations right
out of CSIS and SIRC - the two government agencies that, not-so-coincidentally,
were also used to try to do Ernst Zundel in last spring and summer in a
so far thwarted deportation attempt by having him falsely declared a "security
threat to Canada".
Complicated, isn't it? Not really all that much.
To put it yet another way, Reform is perfectly respectable in many people's
eyes in Canada in that it is opposed to what the Sixties started and what
the Nineties represent. Well, that's about the time span when Ernst Zundel
started telling Canadians precisely what was happening to Canada as Communism
in its many hidden forms began to muscle in.
People close to the Reform Party put out a community paper called "Ottawa
Times." Yesterday, I received a few faxes from the September / October
issue, and when I called the Zundel-Haus for some data verification and
editorial commentary, Ernst said to me with obvious glee:
"This is the first time that I have seen B'nai Brith actually connected to a violent Marxist-anarchist group in print."
Well, hallelujah time!
This is important. The Ottawa Times is a paper that is circulated to all
Canadian Members of Parliament and nationwide to community groups and grassroots
organizations. It is seen by some as an underground "Washington Post"
because it keeps tabs in Ottawa on what happens in the Corridors of Power,
inside and outside of Parliament.
And no wonder Ernst was a happy man. How do you like a headline titled "B'nai
Brith Linked to 'Extremists"? Followed by a subtitle: "Admits
'workable relationship' with militant 'human rights' group"?
That's what we call in German ". . . getting two flies with one swatter!"
Remember that it is B'nai Brith that wants to use the Canadian Human Rights
Commission to put ME out of business because I use the Zundel name and wisdom
in MY attempts to shed light on the dark?
Here is some of the text, which I quote with relish:
"The Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) has decided to pull the name of a highly controversial co-sponsor from its anti-racist poster 'Stop the Hatred.'"
(...)
"With the CHRC distancing itself from the ARA, B'nai Brith appears to be the last notable supporter of the ARA."
What this article is talking about is, of course, an intense Zundel-Haus
campaign based on a video tape obtained some time ago in which a connection
is admitted between the ARA and the Zundel-Haus arson in 1995 - long suspected
of having been set at the behest of nefarious forces in bed with the Canadian
Security Intelligence Service, (CSIS) a civilian spy agency known for its
shameless pandering to the Forever Persecuted!
The Ottawa Times article does more than just hint around that eyebrows are
raised about both the Canadian Human Rights Commission and B'nai Brith -
and why it is that they like ARA, a filthy anarchist-Marxist street gang
mob with international connections.
It names some names - Dr. Karen Mock's name, for one, a B'nai Brith official
who thought nothing of endorsing that ARA rabble in a submission to help
ARA obtain a grant from Toronto's Metro Council government. The Canadian
Human Rights Commission, furthermore, endorsed ARA on a nationally distributed
Anti-Racist Action poster touting that mob as a "valuable anti-racism
resource".
No less address and all!
It gets more interesting. Dr. Mock, if you will remember, is the head honcho
and one of the directors of B'nai Brith and the person who lost it utterly
on March 15th, 1996 in front of national television cameras when she started
shrieking that surely there must be in Canada a system locked in place that
would get the better of "hate monger" Ernst Zundel! This only
minutes after Ernst had just been vindicated, one more time (!) by a Canadian
Court!
On that noteworthy day, all charges of publishing defamation of Jews and
evidencing hatred toward Jews had been dropped by the Attorney General's
experts on "Hate Prosecutions." So what was she kwetching about?
A Mr. Bernstein, no less, is in charge of that group at the Ministry of
the Attorney General. The Attorney General is a Jewish community stalwart
called Charles Harnick, hardly a friend of Ernst Zundel's. So if they COULD
have nailed him, they WOULD HAVE!
Dr. Mock must have thought it over and decided that one fine way of getting
the upper hand on Ernst Zundel would be to ally herself with ARA at the
Toronto Metro Council and the provincial government lottery- funded Trillium
Foundation which sponsored the 1996 ARA conference on "Youth and Hate"
last summer - with the Zundel-Team hot on her heels for wasting good tax
payers' money on nose-ringed street gangs and hoodlums!
Can't you just see a movie once all the dust has settled?
Now states the Ottawa Times:
"Ms. Mock participated personally in the conference. Sitting with her at the podium was ARA-Toronto representative Ajith Aluthwatta, who has recently been linked with animal rights terrorism in BC."
Even now, as I am re-reading this, there flashes before my eyes this super-hoodlum,
Aluthwatta, who slinked by me not two feet away with a street kid comrade
of sorts - a live rat kept in a paper bag! Whatever for? Do disturb witnesses
and disrupt the proceedings? Nothing happened to that rat, so far, you will
be gratified to learn - at least not in the courthouse!
In defense of Karen Mock it must be said that the article also states that
"Karen Mock said B'nai Brith has always condemned the use of violence and that she has always urged the ARA and other groups not to reduce themselves to the same violent behaviour used by their opponents.
"She was not, however, able to say with certainty that B'nai Brith would refuse to associate with the ARA in the future. . .
"But Ms. Mock said she did not understand why the ARA's reputation would tarnish that of B'nai Brith, or more specifically, its League of Human Rights, just because they participate in certain events together."
Interesting. Very, very interesting.
The same B'nai Brith, especially Karen Mock, always slanders people like
Ernst Zundel with their "right wing connections", warning shrilly
of a sinister conspiracy if the people of the Right network and attend speeches
or concerts together.
Remember Canadian school teacher, Paul Fromm, the teacher who was fired
at the behest of B'nai Brith for speaking at a Heritage Front function and
a conservative gathering in the USA?
This tags our opposition! They always, without fail, practice a double standard!
Always!
Was not the whole Heritage Front Affair an attempt to deport Ernst from
Canada to the vassal state called Germany waiting to incarcerate him for
not believing in the Auschwitz Lie - because of a so-called "connection"?
Ernst has NEVER endorsed ANY violent group, as Karen Mock has done at Toronto's
Metro Council - and as the CHRC did on nationally circulated posters!
The Ottawa Times article takes on not just B'nai Brith but also the Canadian
Human Rights Commission for its implicit endorsement of the ARA in other
places such as Winnipeg, by quoting Mrs. Hayes, Reform's Human Rights critic:
"Mrs. Hayes' office said that the group is suspiciously hard to contact. The CHRC poster provides a mailing address, but no phone number.
"There is no phone number in the Winnipeg phone book for the group, and apparently the Canadian Human Rights Commission had no phone number on file in Ottawa.
"Mrs. Hayes' office was eventually directed to the regional director in Winnipeg . . . Even this contact only produced a name and number for the UAR, not the ARA."
And also:
"Tory MPP Bob Woods (London South) sounded grateful for the . . . material about the ARA. He indicated that funding priorities for the Trillium Foundation are under evaluation, and that 'you can be reasonably sure that we will not be recommending the funding of Marxists . . . by the Foundation.'"
And here comes the finale. CHRC media spokesman Donna Balkan told the Ottawa
Times that
"allegations against the ARA - that it is a violent group - are being taken seriously, and that the CHRC is investigating them by contacting police chiefs and community leaders across the country."
Well, that is noble. But this happened only after a stink was raised about
B'nai Brith and CHRC endorsement of that violence-prone rabble - whom they
had rubberstamped and warmly praised and endorsed without first checking!
And there is more. There is yet another headline, above the picture of Michelle
Falardeau-Ramsey, Chief Commissioner of the CHRC, titled:
"CHRC Endorses Hate Group." Remember that this is the very group heading the Zundel Inquisition about "hate mongering".
The Ottawa Times article concludes by saying:
"With the growing intolerance among Americans and Canadians over programs like affirmative action that are allegedly designed to eliminate racism, but which critics say is just another form of racism, groups like B'nai Brith may well be required to maintain high levels of credibility in order to be successful.
"If their opposition to racism comes to be seen as nothing more than a tool to strong-arm their opponents with the help of a compliant government, the cynicism may permanently damage any constructive attempts to confront real racism."
Well put. And to think it wasn't even Ernst Zundel who said it - although
he has in the past, and no doubt will do so again in the future!
One of Ernst's close advisors attended the above-mentioned recent B'nai
Brith symposium on "Hate on the Internet" and came away from it,
exhilarated in one way - and shocked in another way.
"These Internet censorship people don't know WHAT to do next!" she said. "They can't even get their own people out to their own seminars any more!"
So they increasingly feel they must lobby and strong-arm government agencies
like the CHRC and government ministers to do their bidding - undoubtedly
using government grants to finance their lobbying?
I am leafing through one of my favorite references, "You Gentiles"
written by Maurice Samuel, a famous Jewish writer of the 1920s, to summarize
just what is playing here - and there it is, precisely, in his own words:
"What guarantee have we beyond the guarantee of public opinion?" (p. 132)
That's what I read between the lines in the Ottawa Times article.
And that is what I thought when I saw ARA scum in that Toronto courthouse
crawling around those pin-striped suits and pious phrases about "human
rights violations" and ". . . hate mongering against an identifiable
group."
Across the land - in fact, across the globe! - there is a deep, deep spiritual
discomfort generated by these mobster strong-arm tactics by individuals
and groups like B'nai Brith who treat these "Human Rights" organizations
as their private hit squads to silence perfectly legitimate political and
historical viewpoints and absolutely legal political dissent.
It will exact a devastating price, and not in credibility alone, from them
- and play in our favor - if people are allowed to see that those, who claim
their rights are being violated, condone that rats be brought in paper bags
into an Anglo-Saxon courthouse.
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"Germanic Americans: Had enough?"
(Four-word plus phone number classified ad appearing in a California paper)
P.S. Those interested in subscribing to the Ottawa Times or would like to
respond: Tel: 1-613-233-0425 and Fax 1-613-744-7336