Copyright (c) 1997 - Ingrid A. Rimland
"Anyone who grew up during the heyday of the 'progressive' 50's and 60's can discern a distinct change in Jewish behavior.
In the 50's and 60's Jews were kindly, enlightened liberals out to bring brotherhood to the excluded and downtrodden. Today, Jews still mouth liberalism but _demand_ tribute to Israel, _criminalize_ Holocaust denial, crush Arabs, and build Wailing Wall temples to their real and purported WWII sufferings.
Jewish liberalism is a facade for _gentile abuse_. Gentile abuse is a concept which does not appear in the Jewish orthodox history of the world. Orthodoxy of any kind is a device for crushing dissent, and Jews have perfected the technique.
No one can challenge the Jewish orthodox version of anything. One _must_ believe that racism is bad, that Naziism is a satanic force, that Communism was a good force gone bad, etc.
The Jewish orthodox tradition despises gentile freedom of thought. Israel _does_ have a right to exist. Jews are _entitled_ to eternal Holocaust reparations. Swiss banks _must_ pay.
The Jewish orthodox tradition loves lawsuits the same way it loves the dictates of the rabbinate. _Thou shalt obey!_ is the message."
Well, along comes Ernst Zundel who does not obey and keeps asking: "Did
Six Million Really Die"?
What happens? The story of Ernst Zundel's abuse as a gentile is beautifully
summarized in a brief Doug Collins editorial in a recent North Shore News
issue ( . . . no date given in the xerox sent to me):
"Ernst Zundel is described every time his name is mentioned as a "neo-Nazi" and a "Holocaust denier." And he is certainly the latter.
There is no doubt that he likes the memory of Hitler either, although I am not sure what a 'neo-Nazi' is. Is there a neo-Nazi party?
But there's also no doubt that a lot of people around here liked Stalin . . . and nothing's happened to them.
It doesn't really matter what Zundel is. As long as he is breaking no laws he should be entitled to say anything. Speech should be fought with speech.
But if you step over the boundaries set by the pressure groups, you can be hounded to extinction.
Holocaust denial has in effect been turned into a crime in Canada, even though it is not a crime.
Zundel plans to take his case to the United Nations. According to the UN, interference with freedom of opinion by the State _or by private parties_ is prohibited.
Let's hope Zundel wins his case and that Ottawa (and Victoria) are shown up for being the hypocrite capitals of North America.
If he wins, we all win, as we all won when he was the victor in the Supreme Court of Canada in 1992 on that disgraceful _passing false news_ charge.
They tried just about everything with Zundel.
He has been stripsearched, jailed, and made the target of intense vilification.
For a year, he was forbidden to use the mails.
His house was nearly burned down. Arsonists caused $400,000 worth of damage.
He got a parcel bomb that could have killed everyone within 90 yards if he had opened it.
A crowd of "Anti Racist Action" commies and militant Jews stood outside his premises last year shouting "Kill the Nazi." Police stood by.
He would surely have been deported if the Supreme Court had not killed the false news law. Yet killers and terrorists have been allowed to stay here.
He has been denied citizenship even though a top bureaucrat admitted the application was "flawless." This after 40 years in Canada, during which he has been convicted of nothing.
Then there was the attempt last year by the Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC) to have him declared a threat to national security.
That was a joke. Sort of. But the courts prevented it, whereupon the minister for immigration announced he would introduce new laws designed to fix _that_.
Now the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) is being asked to stop Internet material coming into Canada from a website that is operated in his name _out of California_. Even though it is controlled by someone else.
But no one has tried to stop a _pro-Holocaust_ website - Nizkor - that operates from Vancouver Island.
If one, why not the other?
Here's another question. Is anyone who stands up for Zundel's rights automatically a neo-Nazi?"
Good question.
Another one of Matthew's Morsels gives an answer in "The Defining Lie":
"Sin is of the gentiles - or so the Jews would like us to believe.
Jews want the world to wallow in guilt over the Holocaust. It might be better for the Jews to walk among the rubble of demolished Arab houses or to dig among the grave yards of the former Soviet Union.
The Jew has been writing his own script for some time. There is an alternative to the Jews' history of the world. It did not begin in 1933, and most assuredly it did not die in 1945.
The real history of the Jew is written in his own hand. It may be found in his research volumes and in the sealed archives of the world so slowly opening.
That history will give the Jew plenty to wail over, but the guilt shall be his alone.
The Holocaust is not, as the Jew imagines, the defining catastrophe of humanity. It is, rather, the defining lie of the Jew."
Thought for the Day:
"Let us abandon even the thought of being Christians if we have reached the point of trembling before the threats or the traps laid for us . . . "
-- Pope Clement XIII