Copyright (c) 1997 - Ingrid A. Rimland
"A major organization of Reform rabbis has adopted a platform saying that support for Israel is a religious obligation. The document approved recently by the Central Conference of American Rabbis is the first in Reform Judaism's 181-year history to wed secular Zionism, or nationalism, to Jewish theology.
The platform adopted by the conference: Asserts that Judaism is not only a religion; it is a people . . . "
"So what do you call these folks," another reader wants to know.
"Zionazis?"
It is an interesting question with deep-cutting legal implications. As a
religious group, do these people have a right to push their "Holocaust"
history in public schools? At least in America, there is such a thing as
"separation of church and state" that is still part of our Constitution.
This writer makes the point that
". . . more and more Jews are admitting it now that they are both a secular and a religious people, nation, culture, and civilization that transcends national boundaries.
Isn't this a startling admission that what Hitler wrote in 'Mein Kampf', in 1923, no less, about the pivotal Jewish 'Big Lie' deception, was true after all?
Didn't Jews everywhere . . . until very recently, collectively, officially, and vociferously, proclaim, that they were NOT a separate and unique people, (ein Volk) or a nation (with) its own unique geopolitical interests and with a common ethnocultural heritage?
So was Hitler right again?
Was it not then indeed the kind of 'Big Lie' that potentially threatened the security of a host nation at war? What else then cannot be believed?
Could 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' not be a forgery after all, as is so indignantly claimed by this same crowd?
Was there perhaps some truth to the 'Stab in the Back Theory' that Hitler wrote of so extensively?
What got the US into the war? Could it have involved a quid pro quo arrangement with the British?
Was it the British-Jewish Balfour Declaration that with the stroke of a pen and a handshake illegally ceded vast amounts of Palestinian owned Palestine to the Zionists and their Jewish supporters during W.W.I?
What significance is there then to the fact that the agreement was negotiated in 1916, a good number of months before America entered the war, and wasn't actually officially signed until some months after Wilson declared war?
Did the Zionists in Germany and internationally, therefore, have a vested interest in a British victory and actually act accordingly behind the scenes?
What other self-serving 'Big Lies' were told by the Zionists, the international Jewish leadership, and the Allies for that matter?
What was the cost of this '. . . we are a religion' to the Germans, the Americans, and the world?
A can of worms? Yup!
It seems to me this opens things up to not only these kinds of questions involving Germany, and Germanic heritage and identity everywhere, but it also seems to precipitate countless others, involving the U.S., and numerous other countries!
I wonder what has changed that is enabling this to come out of the closet?
Perhaps we should ask ourselves that question quite sincerely, since we have been forced into the thick of all this by history! . . ."
Well, I'll tell you. One of the very first documents I placed on the Zundelsite
was a "Book Alert" to one of the most stunningly summarized treatises
on the "Holocaust" as it pertains to religion that I have ever
read. It is "The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism: Keystone of the New World
Order".
From it I lift the following:
"If 'Holocaust' means history, then it is open to investigation, like any other claim. If, on the other hand, it is part of a people's religion, then we must purge it from our schools - for little does it say for our nation, founded on the principle of Separation of Church and State, to allow an alien religion to be impressed upon young, vulnerable minds when Christianity itself is forbidden as a subject in the classrooms of our nation. (...)
If it were not so tragic, involving calumny and billions of dollars of fraudulent 'reparations' extracted from a victimized people (the Germans) and the instilling of guilt, based upon lies, into coming generations for crimes they never committed, it would be funny to see the 'survivors' of the Holocaust increase daily. (...)
To accept without a doubt, to accuse without evidence, to intimidate without proof, to lie without punishment. . . was unthinkable in The West . . . . In the case of the 'Holocaust', the bodies are missing, their numbers unproved, the method of killing disproved, the places not there, and the witnesses incredible. Nevertheless, in spite of revisionist research by the top scientists and scholars of the West who have risked all that is possible in life to risk for the sake of ascertaining the truth, the speaking and remembering and fictionalizing about the 'Holocaust' proceeds untouched by facts. (...)
Who is powerful enough to dictate in these closing years of the twentieth century what shall be heard or not heard, spoken or not spoken, written or not written? Certainly it is not the Christians who merely, like sheep, ask for a bleating of equal time."
The author of this nifty little paperback is one Ben Weintraub - which is
a pseudonym and does not mean a thing.
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
". . . To realize how far American education has sunk, consider that a High School student in Maine in 1975 thought that 'Jesus Christ' was no more than a 'curse word.'
(Ben Weintraub in "The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism: Keystone of the New World Order")