Three informal items this morning - from France, from Austria, and from
Switzerland. When you read these items (and others to come) please keep
in mind that the correspondents do not write in their native language.
(Neither do I, for that matter. English is the sixth language that I learned,
which explains my often convoluted Germanic syntax, odd spelling and ornate
punctuation . . . So hush!)
". . . As you may know, our Prime Minister, Alain Juppe, had dinner on January 25 with the CRIF representatives (Conseil representatif des institutions juives de France - Representative Council for the Jewish Institutions in France) and said that he would soon create a commission in charge of evaluating the extent of the despoilment of the Jews in France under German occupation.
You surely remember that, on July 16, 1995, Mr Chirac, the president of the Republic, had spoken about the "imprescriptible debt" owed to the Jews by the French.
Now, 50 years after the war, the commission will have to define a figure for this debt, despite the fact that not one Jew has yet claimed to be given back the slightest property!
Bruno Gollnisch, the General Secretary of the far right Front national, has just issued a press release, which was only partly quoted in the daily "Le Monde" and which you will find hereafter . . . in quick and terribly poor English:
"TO ALL WAR VICTIMS
PRESS RELEASE OF BRUNO GOLLNISCH
When participating to the CRIF dinner, Mr Juppe announced that the case of the compensation of Jewish victims of WWII would be re-opened, a case that one would think - apparently wrongly - had long been settled.
Although such a redress was long in coming, it arouses tremendous hopes. It has to be extended to all the war victims who have not yet received any compensation, or who have been fobbed off with depreciated money: families of killed soldiers or civilians, people who lived in the tens of thousands houses which were destroyed by allied bombing, prisoners held more than 4 years in captivity, innocent victims of the purges (at the end of the war).
But also after that date: the Catholics in Tonkin, the forgotten Harkis (Algerian soldiers loyal to the French), the Pieds-Noirs of Algeria (Algerian-born French people), etc.
All those who have been ruined because of their country's policy, all the martyrs, all those who have been abandoned as a result of our cowardice, all of them must at last see the day of the great redress, a redress which cannot be limited to one sole community.
Any other solution would violate the principles of equality of rights and of non-discrimination, and might be liable to revive an antisemitism that everyone of us, in his own rank, must try to avert."
(end of press release; comments in brackets added for clarification; paragraph
breaks added for readability)
An Austrian correspondent writes:
"The biggest and most crazy atrocity ever happened in Austria (is) the fact the "democratic" republic of Austria has now started criminal procedings against the wives of the convicted "Neo-Nazis".
That is Angela Brunner, 29 Years, one child, Brigitte Binder, 28 Years, one child, Judith Kovar, 26 Years, two children, Dagmar Obermayer, 30 Years old, three children.
What did these women do? Nothing; they just were "unlucky" being married to the wrong man at the wrong time. They went with their husbands to seminars and meetings, cooked coffee for them, baked a cake, ironed their shirts, went with them to birthdays-parties . . . They acted and did exactly what millions of other woman will do when they love their husbands.
Just go with them, stick with them.
What could happen to them? The maximum sentence is lifelong prison when convicted. In practice maybe 3 years jail. For cooking dinner and serving coffee? These women are charged with "staatsgefaehrende" activities. A danger to the state.
A shame for Austria, we say, and we all have the duty to do something about it.
The most amazing thing is that they found a public prosecutor crazy and corrupt enough to file these charges against innocent families . . . these families should be happy and glad, because the government has not yet charged the mothers, the fathers, the grandmother, the uncles and of course the children.
Who is behind all this? Mainly the criminal terror organization DOEW who now gets more than 5 Mill. AS donation every year to spy on people and defame them, but also gets support and donation from Jewish organization in USA.
Now everything should be clear and fall into place. The Allied-Zionist war on Austria and Germany has never stopped, and now the war starts up again and this time also for Switzerland and many more countries to follow."
" . . . More than 100 prominent Swiss citizens - among them the authors Thomas Huerlimann and Adolf Muschg as well as the actor Bruno Ganz - have signed a manifesto in which they ask ". . . for honesty in discourse with history and a broad discussion about anti-Semitism . . . "
(as reported to the Zundelsite from a secondary source)
As called for in the Swiss "manifesto", the issue in all three
of the items above is, of course, the political exploitation of the concept
"anti-semitism."
A most important point to keep in mind! I don't recall the reference now,
but somewhere I read an article to the effect that the concept itself had
been worked back into some encyclopedias thanks to some discreet Holocaust-lobbying
- AFTER it had been dropped by the scholars as insignificant.
"Anti-Semitism" is enormously useful - NOT TO US who are constantly
assailed with that charge, but to the ASSAILANTS who use it to mow down
all opposition to covert, much more globally malevolent aims.
How is that done? In "The Semisovereign People", K.K. Schattschneider
writes:
"The most obvious thing in the world is the fact that an issue does
not become an issue merely because someone says it is. The stakes in making
an issue are incalculably great. Millions of attempts are made, but an issue
is produced only when a battle is joined.
Why do some movements succeed and others fail? Why do some ideas gain currency
and acceptance while others do not? Why do some conflicts become dominant
while others attract no support?
Dominance is related to intensity and visibility, the capacity to blot out
other issues."
That's why you see such wolfish struggle on the part of the Zionist Lobby
for sole control and vigil of the Internet. Websites such as the Zundelsite
thwart the entrenched intensity and visibility of global, profitable Gentile
exploitation and German-bashing.
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"Never can any advantage be taken of nature by a trick."
(Ralph Waldo Emerson)