The hoax is now in intellectual shambles and will be so revealed as soon as reputable scientists and courageous members of the media are allowed to have their say unhampered by the vicious special interest persecution aimed at life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness of all the current truth tellers.
It's over. Finished. Done.
Once and for all, it could be settled tomorrow if there could be arranged a reputable, neutral and impartial investigation into the claims and counter-claims of what is called the "Holocaust" - and we could all move on.
Although I know it drains a lot of vital mental energy from what is really needed to make this world a cleaner world, I keep on hammering away at it because I feel by speaking of the Holohoax, I use the most efficient means of making people focus on what is still beneath the surface and not as recognizable - which is the real and present danger imposed by alien interests set to destroy our Western civilization and culture and all we have achieved in 3,000 years' worth of history.
The formula I use is simple and underlies all of my ZGrams:
"If we have been deceived so systematically and cruelly about the so-called Holocaust - what is the REAL agenda of those who use the Holocaust as both a weapon and a shield?"
The real agenda, in many people's mind, including mine, is Orwell's "1984" and "Animal Farm." It is the Global Plantation scenario - total control of Western man's mind and Western man's productivity for the sole benefit of the parasitic interests of a very cunning and extremely powerful few.
In a ZGram several days ago I used the word ZOG to label this devious elite that keeps on burrowing, deceiving and diverting. I did so, not having a better term with which to label entities who undermine our way of life for their self-serving ends.
Well, one of my strongest aficionados really called me on the carpet for that one - telling me that it was cornball stuff. Here is what my good friend said, brought to you now for further thought in somewhat shortened form:
". . . Give it up. It will cost you vital support. The ideas, Ingrid--the raw and life-giving ideas--are what matter! Don't compromise them with goofy labels.
Who cares if Van Gogh was an "Impressionist" or not: it's the body of work he produced that matters. You'll be making Zundel's work just another marginalized cause.
I respect you, Ingrid, but I think the runner stumbled here. My feeling is you must be under a lot of stress for you to have unnecessarily stuck a feather on a marble statue . . . "
I was really surprised by this response, because I had thought nothing of speaking of ZOG. Here in America, the term is instantly recognized and by no means endorsed as valid by only the marginal, low-brow, dissatisfied masses.
I know, because I speak a lot at luncheons for Rotary folks and such. I always use that opportunity to sound them out a bit on this and that, including ZOG'ish matters.
I asked my friend to clarify where his dislike for the ZOG acronym had come from, and here is what he said in follow-up:
". . . I'll use Ernst's own words to underscore my point. This commentary of his made its appearance in a Power Newsletter when, if memory serves, Ernst was limited as to what he could say . . . only discreet references to "the forbidden topic" pursuant to the gag-order.
On one occasion he laid bare his feelings about the Klan. It seems he was put off by the robes and other effeminate paraphernalia.
I distinctly remember he described the Klan outfits as "unmanly," and so on. I agreed . . I would have added to "unmanly" such unflattering adjectives as "goofy," "campy," and "corny."
I think it's generally agreed by friends and foes alike that David Duke became a serious political contender once he made up his mind to stash his Klan robes and dunce cap away in the closet and don a well-tailored dark-blue businessman's suit. To my mind, "ZOG" is the equivalent of the Klan robes and dunce caps.
It's the equivalent to Jessie Jackson's "Hymietown" allusion to New York. It's the same kind of off-putting, thought-stopping, campy clich that might appeal to the wrong people for the wrong reasons.
You don't want the trailer trash from the Sally Jesse Raphael Show jumping on the Zundel bandwagon. You don't want to attract mindless clones and drones with pre-packaged verbiage.
Your work is an outreach to our intellectual elites and to those armies of decent grassroots people who intuit the truth and wait for patriots to come and articulate these truth for them.
What you want (is) to reach the best people.
Kitschy references to "ZOG" - like something from the screenplay from the George Lucas sci-fi classic Star Wars - is going to turn them off . . .
My viscera and experience tells me that the use of "ZOG" would help to make our work all the easier to caricature. It would distract seriously from the raw, libertaing, life-giving energy of the truth about WW 2 history.
"ZOG" is a downcast cannon aimed at your own two feet. . . "
Well. You live and learn. Back to the drawing board.
I have no problem doing that - if only there were something better! But by making me shelve a weak and self-defeating weapon, my good friend hands me back my original problem - which is: How to describe The Enemy?
How can you fight a war if you are not allowed to call your enemy by name?
What IS his name?
If not ZOG, does he HAVE a name that fits his tactics better - which is to use our governments against our very interests? And make us pay for our enslavement and ultimate destruction? With our own tax dollars?
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"It would indeed be a tragedy if the history of the human race proved to be nothing more than the story of an ape playing with a box of matches on a petrol dump."
(David Ormsby Gore)