June 3, 1996
Good Morning from the Zundelsite:
Remember some time ago I mentioned in a previous ZGram that Canada Customs
had seized a copy of "The Jefferson Bible" as "hate literature"?
This book was sent to Ernst Zundel (along with other literature ordered
from the Institute for Historical Review) because Ernst wanted to restock
his library, torched to the howls of the mob and dances of the hora in the
streets and sidewalks of Toronto.
Where there is force applied-such as the seizing of writings deemed "hateful"
and "inciting violence" protecting certain ethnic groups at the
expense of others-there will be counter-force resisting it. Some of it,
we are happy to report, comes from a notable source in Australia, the Australian
Civil Liberties Union.
In the Adelaide Institute's April 1996 issue, I found the following letter,
worthy of sharing with both our friends and foes alike. The letter pertains
to a book that I happen to have read (written by Nigel Jackson - The Case
for David Irving) that chastizes the beholden powers of the Government of
Australia for banning David Irving's books.
Irving, as many people know, is one of Europe's foremost historical authors
who writes in the popular vein. He is also, thanks to the Second (1988)
Great Holocaust Zundel trial, at which he saw the light about the so-called
"Holocaust", an outspoken Revisionist.
As many of us know, David Irving's books have been banned from Canada-as
Irving has, in person, not for what he has said, but for what he MIGHT say-and
someone by the name of Geoffrey Muirden, Secretary of the Australian Civil
Liberties Union, came up with the following as a challenge to Revenue Canada:
Joel A. Oliver
Director, Prohibited Importations,
Revenue Canada,
Customs, Excise and Taxation
Ottawa, Canada K1A )L5
27th December 1995
Dear Mr. Oliver:
Thank you for your letter dated 16 November 1995, in which you inform me
that Nigel Jackson's book, The Case for David Irving, is defined as "hate
propaganda" in the Criminal Code.
Since you are so disturbed about "hate propaganda", I enclose
details of the Jewish Talmud, which has been distributing hate against the
"goyim" (itself a hateful term, since it means "human cattle",
the Jews only permitting themselves to be fully human).
Enclosed are summaries of the hateful comments about Christ, Christians
and Christianity, which would, of course, make it liable as hate propaganda.
I draw your attention, for example, to the hate mongering and blasphemous
reference to Christ as the illegitimate son of a liaison of intercourse
between His mother, Mary, and Pandira, a Roman soldier. Christ is also called
a "fool" who "corrupts his morals and dishonours himelf"
and "died like a beast and is buried in an animal's dirt heap".
This is hateful enough, but it doesn't stop there. I've underlined some
of the most hateful expressions in the Talmud.
Hateful references to Christians as "idolaters", Christians "have
sex with animals", Jews are "innocent of murder if intended to
kill a Christian". This is of course an incitement to murder. Christians
idoleters likened to cows and asses; Christians are like unclean beasts;
non-Jews' souls go straight to hell. Jews can lie and perjure to condemn
a Christian; name of God not profaned when lying to Christians; and Jews
can perjure themselves with a clear conscience. The last is, of course,
an incitement to lie and cheat.
I feel sure you will be disgusted with this "hate propaganda"
and please let me know how many raids you make on Jewish synagogues in Canada
to seize the hateful Talmud and destroy it-also, of course, arresting rabbis
who dispense this filth.
It can only be a lack of understanding of this hate propaganda in the midst
of Canadians that has hindered your actions against this in the past. Now
(that) you have been advised, please keep me informed of actions against
Jews dispensing the Talmud, reading this filth at synagogues, which will
have to be invaded to take away copies of this corrupting literature.
I await details of your moral crusade with great interest.
Yours faithfully,
Geoff. Muirden, Secretary, Australian Civil Liberties Union, P.O. Box 1137,
Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia.
(End of letter)
As with so many other good ideas that come across the ZGRam desk, I like
this one and wish that we would make a test case. Instead of spending so
much money, time and energy on saying WE are innocent of indiscriminate
hate, we ought to turn the tables and ask if those who cash in on artificial
guilt by calling us "hate mongers" are innocent of hate mongering
themselves.
However, Ernst tells me that in each province in Canada, the provincial
Attorney General must give his consent before a "hate prosecution"
is started. "So far", says Ernst, "every attempt
that I know of has been thwarted by those "gate-keepers" at the
ATO. Also, the hate law specificially excludes religious expression from
prosecution. Muirden's letter is nice, but won't move Canada Customs one
bit."
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"Rather perish than hate and fear, and twice rather perish than
make oneself hated and feared."
(Friedrich Nietzsche)
Comments? E-Mail: irimland@cts.com
Back to Table of Contents of the June 1996 ZGrams