May 14, 1996
'We will surround them. And we will kill them.'"
One of my readers replied:
". . . Powell said, 'First we'll cut it off, then we'll kill it.' - he was referring to the Iraqi army actually, not the Iraqi people.
I am stunned by your criticism of Israel and your love of the Iraqis, America's great enemy, ruled by a brutal tyrant. I thought you were engaging in a serious debate about WW II, about the Holocaust, I am shocked by this absurd side-track. . ."
I concede I may have quoted wrong, because I did so from memory.
But I don't think the essence of this quote is wrong the way I used it
within the context of that ZGram.
Nor do I think what happens in Iraq is extraneous to the Holocaust topic.
For most of us involved in this struggle, we are no longer arguing the
factual tenets of the Holocaust-we KNOW it is a fraud. It has been so proven
and will be so revealed.
At this point in our understanding of World War II and of its aftermath,
we argue that the Holocaust is a vicious political weapon that bludgeons
any criticism of many Israelis actions. I used the ZGram in that sense-simply
saying that there was genocide in full swing as of this minute-NOW-and
that the victims were a documented half a million children.
What else am I to do or say? To be silent when there is documented genocide
that isn't alleged genocide of the Jews? That's what I was trying to say.
Nonetheless, I am not indifferent to criticism coming from a friend who
agrees with me on many other tenets of our struggle to get at historical
truth in free and unfettered inquiry.
To change the topic slightly:
I received the following from a reader in Switzerland who took the information
below from a regular news wire. (I have written for the exact source .
. . )
". . . Fifty years after the end of the Second World War, a total of 5,570 cases in which individuals are suspected of having committed crimes during the National Socialist regime remain unresolved, Minister of Justice Edward Schmidt-Joertzig (FDP) announced in late February at the presentation of Germany's first national compilation of statistics on the prosecution of Nazi crimes.
'The data show,' Schmidt-Joertzig said, 'that prosecutors still take the task of bringing those responsible for the horrendous crimes of the Hitler dictatorship to justice seriously. . . '"
According to this correspondent, Germany has prosecuted 106,178 (!)
persons since 1945. 6,494 were convicted. This amounts to a conviction
rate of 6.12% (!) And I would like to add that many were convicted in the
immediate postwar era when the "eye witness" testimony and affidavits
were massively faked and could seldom be verified.
A perfect example: remember the 7 Germans convicted of the Katyn massacre
(by the Soviets), based on "eye witness" testimony and 4,400
(!) fraudulent affidavits by Russian witnesses? All later proven to be
coerced and faked.
Nonetheless, the German soldiers were executed and to this day never rehabilitated
by the Germans or the Russians, even though Gorbachev ADMITTED Katyn as
one of Stalin's crimes!
". . . And this," writes my Swiss correspondent, referring to the statistics of people charged compared to people actually convicted, "using all the kangaroo court powers of the allies and their German puppets! They should be laughed into oblivion by the world.
These "horrendous" crimes must be in the same realm as the fictitious "holocaust"- or the conviction rate would be in the 90+%.
Imagine 6% conviction! That boggles the mind! . . "
It does - doesn't it? When you think of all the money, misery, destroyed
reputations and ruined careers etc. that this has meant, you wonder how
the Allies and their Quislings in Europe can look at themselves in the
mirror.
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"No one idea can terrorize a whole nation unless we are all its accomplices."
(Edward R. Murrow)